data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30093/30093c130ad41592ce558e55e33f43113e74ba27" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a9c1/5a9c174c36a916631ac7c1aa3f386b34f20f7364" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a08/55a08c9cf17253c00444e866e18e29a7c7d5c188" alt=""
Step 4. Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc339/dc339a91096e27b8390b49ba342265dd2b8905be" alt=""
I don't think it turned out terrible. Some things are off, but I just wish I got the eye's closer to the original, and the hair. The mouth I thought turned out terrible, but it was a lot closer than I thought.
The best way to learn any skill is to practice and teach it. This blog allows talented folks the ability to critique and be critiqued. Techniques will be perfected, eyes will become sharper, and we will go from good to great. Honest, constructive, and sincere (not mean-spirited) comments are welcomed and appreciated. We will focus primarily on animation principles with flexibility on other subjects (technology, clean-up).
4 comments:
the eyes seem way off.
the 3-dimensionality is pretty good
The comparison is quite good. But there are allot subtle things that don't match the original. Like his lips. It's not just round.
I sent the to john k. a while back. He pretty much told me it was solid, which he liked, and that I should just do more of these studies. He also said something like how the little details seem easier to fall into place after a while. I did do a bunch of things from the blair book, and older cartoons since the blog kinda died out, should I try to dig 'em up, or just post newer studies?
Post a Comment